Human laughter is rooted in the emotional displays of the common ancestor we share with apes, suggests an analysis of the vocalizations of tickled juvenile apes and humans. Human speech is unique among animals, but researchers have long debated how our laughter might relate to similar vocalizations made by other primates. Scientists from Charles Darwin to Dian Fossey, author of Gorillas in the Mist, have compared the laughter of non-human primates with that of humans, and found similarities but also important differences. Chimpanzees emit more of a panting laughter, for instance, whereas humans generally use their voices to laugh while breathing out.
A team led by psychologist Marina Davila Ross of the University of Portsmouth, UK, undertook the task of tickling 25 young apes and humans, and recorded the resulting laughter (see video). They report this week in Current Biology that similarities between the acoustic characteristics of each species’ laughter roughly reflects their genetic relatedness1.
The study brings “state-of-the-art audio analysis” to the problem, and helps to clarify how ape laughter and vocal production evolved, says psychologist Robert Provine of the University of Maryland in Baltimore County, who was not involved in the work.
Marina Davila Ross and chimpMarina Davila Ross and Karla.Davila Ross, M.
“Laughter is important to study because it’s a universal part of human language and a tool [with which] to study vocal evolution,” he adds.
Davila Ross and her co-workers tickled a total of 21 infant and juvenile orangutans, gorillas, chimpanzees and bonobos, as well as one siamang, and three human infants. Laughter was scored according to 11 acoustic variables, including the duration and pitch of vocalizations, the time between them, and whether the animals were breathing in or out while vocalizing.
“Particularly the gorilla and the bonobo could produce [human-like] sounds while breathing out for more than 10 seconds,” says Davila Ross. The more distantly related orangutan and siamang’s laughter, meanwhile, was correspondingly distinct.
The researchers were surprised when they found that some of the apes’ laughter lasted for more than one breathing cycle, says Davila Ross. The finding contradicts one explanation for why human laughter and vocal production differs so much from that of apes, namely that non-human primates, which walk on all fours, breathe in synchrony with their walking, whereas bipedal humans breathe independently of their walking.
Davila Ross hopes phylogenetic approaches such as this one will be used in further studies of the evolution of vocalizations. “I’m interested in learning more about how these vocalizations are being used in social play,” she says.
“They’re finding evidence of chimp voicing and more freedom for ape sound production,” adds Provine. “I see that as a friendly addition to the existing evidence.”